No. 20-7325
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure cross-examination disclosure due-process exculpatory-evidence fair-trial fifth-amendment government-misconduct witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy Jurisdiction
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the timing and method of the Government's disclosure violate Todd's Fifth Amendment to right to a fair trial, by preventing Todd from finding and using the exculpatory footage in sufficient time to cross-examine Jackson and ascertain the truth about his conduct, thus prejudicing Todd and undermining confidence in the verdict against him?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the timing and method of the Government's disclosure violate Todd's Fifth Amendment right to a fair trial
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Eric Todd
Philip M Longmeyer — Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent