WHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AFFIRMED THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER'S DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIM(S) BROUGHT AGAINST RENTGROW AND DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT AGAINST CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ACTION OR APPEAL (i) IS FRIVOLOUS OR MALICIOUS; (ii) FAIL TO STATE A CLAIM ON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED; OR (iii) SEEK MONETARY RELIEF FROM A DEFENDANT WHO IS IMMUNE FROM SUCH RELIEF AND JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 12(b), WHEN IN FACT BOTH RENTGROW AND CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY ARE ENTITIES ESTABLISHED OUTSIDE THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA THEREBY MEETING THE REQUIREMENT OF DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP.

WHETHER FAILURE TO PERMIT LAYMAN TO AMEND HIS COMPLAINT FOR A SECOND TIME PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2) INFRINGES THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED CONSTITUTION.

Whether the district court erred in dismissing the complaint against the defendant(s) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction