No. 20-7278

Charles Dennis Friedman v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus parole statute-of-limitations tenth-circuit
Latest Conference: 2021-03-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

A. Whether the Tenth Circuit's decision departs so vastly from the accepted course of judicial proceedings —by forcing a litigant to challenge a decision before that decision is made—that it warrants the exercise of this Court's supervisory power.

B. Whether the Tenth Circuit decision squarely conflicts with this Court's precedent such that it warrants this Court's intervention.

C. In the alternative, whether the Tenth Circuit's misapplication of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(4) warrants summary reversal.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Tenth Circuit's decision departs so vastly from the accepted course of judicial proceedings—by forcing a litigant to challenge a decision before that decision is made—that it warrants the exercise of this Court's supervisory power

Docket Entries

2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Charles Friedman
Grant Russell SmithOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent