I. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the U.S. Sentencing Commission acted within its authority by its commentary to $ U.S. Sentencing Guidelines $ 48t.2, which broadened the detailed definition of oocontrolled substance offense" set out at $ 4B1.2(b) to include inchoate offenses?

II. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the definition of "controlled substance offense" set out atUSSG $4b1 .2(b) is unambiguous? If so, then judicial deference to the Commission's interpretation that the language includes inchoate offenses is unwarranted pursuant to Kisor v. Wilkie,588 US _,139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019).

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the U.S. Sentencing Commission acted within its authority by its commentary to § U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.2, which broadened the detailed definition of 'controlled substance offense' set out at § 4B1.2(b) to include inchoate offenses?