No. 20-7272

Tyslen J. Baker v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arrest-warrant civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause search-and-seizure
Latest Conference: 2021-03-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does a police officer violate a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights by executing an arrest warrant consisting of bare bones allegations lacking in probable cause as well as a temporal connection to the alleged offense or information contained in the warrant.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a police officer violate a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights by executing an arrest warrant consisting of bare bones allegations lacking in probable cause as well as a temporal connection to the alleged offense or information contained in the warrant

Docket Entries

2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisOtherOtherPetitionOtherOtherOther

Attorneys

Tyslen Baker
Michael Trent Lee — Michael Trent Lee, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent