No. 20-7271
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment illinois-v-caballes k9-deployment rodriguez-v-united-states search-and-seizure traffic-stop
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
If WrtfsaW\ (X W&C \& (Lompleki dot5 X\\\nois V, CoSo<x\W
5V3 u.5. HOS, 135 5.a 834, IbO L.EA. 0<A 841 W
ClDac^m'mg Ata <kf\oymu4 0|a^?
WKor\ Cmc^r^ K4 (h^rr^ni during a Am^-lc sVcp vohlc^
XlW>5 V. (LxWfe 5H3 U. S. Hfc, 135* 3,c_4. 83H, 160
°r ^ric,uiz, m. \KW\ SV<s.tas XX U.S. 3H8. ?AppphccMoo 4t> -\KaV an
(~a%L
L. EX 2i 84ft
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the rule in Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405, 135 S.Ct. 834, 160 L.Ed. 2d 842 applies to the deployment of a K9 during a traffic stop
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Ramon A. Boyce
Ramon A. Boyce — Petitioner