No. 20-727
Facebook, Inc. v. Perrin Aikens Davis, et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure consent content-provider electronic-communication internet-content-provider internet-privacy user-consent web-browser wiretap-act
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether an internet content provider violates the Wiretap Act where a computer user's web browser instructs the provider to display content on the webpage the user visits.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an internet content provider violates the Wiretap Act where a computer user's web browser instructs the provider to display content on the webpage the user visits
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-03-03
Reply of petitioner Facebook, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-11
Brief of respondents Perrin Aikens Davis, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-12-28
Brief amici curiae of Internet Association, et al. filed.
2020-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2020 to February 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 11, 2021.
2020-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Facebook, Inc.
Jeffrey L. Fisher — O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
Internet Association, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Software and Information Industry Association, and Computer and Communications Industry Association
Perrin Aikens Davis, et al.
Matthew W.H. Wessler — Gupta Wessler PLLC, Respondent