No. 20-7269

Antonio U. Akel v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-26
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction final-judgment habeas-corpus rule-60b-motion standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-03-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in denying a Rule 60(b) motion to reopen a final judgment denying habeas corpus relief, where the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion is appealable as a separate final order

Docket Entries

2021-03-29
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisAppendixProof of ServicePetition

Attorneys

Antonio U. Akel
Antonio U. Akel — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent