No. 20-7259
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability compulsory-process constitutional-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel section-2255 sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration
HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-03-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was petitioner denied his Constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel during his trial, that is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution.and his right to Compulsory Process?
2. Was the United States 'District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma was plainly wrong for denying petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition?
3. Was the United States Court of Appeals for the tenth Circuit plainly for denying petitioner'a certificate of appealability (GOA) ?wrong
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner denied his Constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel during his trial, that is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and his right to Compulsory Process?
Docket Entries
2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Juan Garcia
Juan Garcia — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent