No. 20-7258

Toi Horn v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-limitations bankruptcy civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-appeal due-process estate-claims fifth-amendment standing takings trust-property
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Takings
Latest Conference: 2021-04-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

Petitioner request to ask this Court to review whether the infant/minor 's denial of
their constitutional appeal be final from the District Court District of Maryland,
Greenbelt division and the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and thus this
denial be given the authority to impound the property and funds for the creation of
a trust, and attempt to deprive the infant/minor the right to the absolute enjoyment
of the funds/property of one who has come forth now, and is appearing at the age
of majority:

1. Whether the district court erred in denying Petitioner's request to review
Respondents bookkeeping entries (both receivables and payables) and the
full accounting on the accounts receivables and accounts payables resulting
from the deposit of TRUST/Estate of the ward/Beneficiary onto the courts
accounts receivables and other general intangibles, a Constitutional
violation?

2. Whether the circuit court and district court erred in denying
Petitioner/infant, minor in exercising the 5th Amendment right to due
process under the United States Constitution, which states - "no one shall be
deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law"?

3. Whether the circuit court for Prince George 's County erred in granting
Respondents the authority to file a false fictitious estate in the court record,
and accept Respondents false claim as real which gave Respondents the
power to sell the trust and the trust property by using a false Bond that
stated the trust/estate had a mortgage agreement with them; is this error a
violation of the 5th Amendment takings clause under the United States
Constitution that states "private property shall not be taken for public use,
without just compensation"?

4. Whether the circuit court, district court, the Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit
erred in denying Petitioner their entitlement to relief of damages in equity?

5. Whether the district court and Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit be
given the authority to act in violation of administrative constitutional or
statutory limitations on its powers?

6. Whether the circuit court for Prince George 's County, district court, and
court of appeals erred in denying Petitioner to subpoena records from
Respondents, (to compel testimony by a witness or production of evidence?)

7. Whether Respondents missed the deadline to file their claim under
Maryland Code Estates and Trusts Title 8-Claims of Creditors Subtitle 1 -
General Section 8-103, by failing to file their claims against the decedent
with the Register of Wills for Prince George's County, Maryland within six
(6) months from the date of the decedent's death in a timely manner?

8. WTiether the circuit court erred in denying completing a full investigation of
the false estate at issue before ratifying Respondents sale of the trust
property/home; Respondent 's actions made the lower courts believe that
Respondents had a Deed of Trust and Note with the false estate that should
have been examined before the unlawful sale?

9. Whether the appointed trustee took an oath to uphold the United States
Constitution before the Bankruptcy court appointed the contracted trustee
over Petitioner 's Bankruptcy chapter 7 case?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the infant/minor's denial of their constitutional appeal be final from the District Court District of Maryland, Greenbelt division and the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and thus this denial be given the authority to impound the property and funds for the creation of a trust, and attempt to deprive the infant/minor the right to the absolute enjoyment of the funds/property

Docket Entries

2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-05
Reply of petitioner Toi Horn filed.
2021-03-26
Brief of respondents FNMA, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)

Attorneys

FNMA, et al.
Regina Marie SloweyOrlans PC, Respondent
Toi Horn
Toi J'vhann Horn — Petitioner