No. 20-7254
Juan Valenzuela v. L. Small, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 9th-circuit brady-violation criminal-justice-act criminal-procedure due-process federal-habeas federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus in-forma-pauperis ninth-circuit-review police-misconduct writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-03-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, in affirming a district court's denial of federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), the Ninth Circuit unreasonably applied this Court's precedent when it concluded that Petitioner's Brady claim, based on a police officer's undisclosed misconduct at the time of trial that res
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit unreasonably applied SCOTUS precedent in concluding that petitioner's Brady-claim failed for lack of prejudice
Docket Entries
2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-02
Waiver of right of respondent Small, Warden to respond filed.
2021-02-19
Attorneys
Juan Valenzuela
Michael Lawrence Parente — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
L. Small
Herbert S. Tetef — Attorney Gene. of California, Respondent