No. 20-7236
Vincent E. Boyd v. Dylon Radtke, Warden
IFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability court-procedure due-process legal-representation pro-se-defendant self-representation sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-right standby-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should courts have to clearly define, on the record, the proper role of standby counsel in the proceedings? In other words, should courts engage in a colloquy with pro se defendants and counsel in order to establish the proper role of standby counsel for the defendant and counsel, thereby, protecting defendants' Sixth Amendment right to self-representation? Further, did this issue warrant the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should courts have to clearly define, on the record, the proper role of standby counsel in the proceedings?
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Vincent E. Boyd
Vincent E. Boyd — Petitioner