No. 20-7230

Stanley Joseph Thompson v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions counsel-concession criminal-defense criminal-defense-counsel due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mccoy-v-louisiana prejudice sixth-amendment trial-strategy
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-03-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the Sixth Amendment permits criminal
defense counsel to unilaterally concede his client's
guilt before the jury at trial—over the defendant's
objection—so long as counsel reserves at least one
element of the offense, however innocuous and
incontestable that element may be, thereby avoiding
this Court's edict in McCoy U. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct.
1500 (2018).

2. Whether criminal defense counsel's u
unilateral
concession of guilt to one or more key elements of a
criminal offense at trial—over the defendant's
and ethically
objection—is a c
constitutionally
permissible trial strategy within the meaning of the
assistance
of
counsel
Court's
ineffective
jurisprudence, and whether the prejudice flowing
from such a concession can be measured.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment permits criminal-defense-counsel to unilaterally-concede-guilt,

Docket Entries

2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Stanley Thompson
David M. ChaikenChaikenLaw Ltd., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent