WHETHER PETITIONER'S ARGUMENT UNDER UNITED STATES V. DAVIS, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019), DESERVES CLOSER SCRUTINY, WHERE APPLYING THE SAME STANDARDS IN DAVIS, PROVES THAT BANK ROBBERY UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) IS NOT A "CRIME OF VIOLENCE" FOR PURPOSES OF 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), BECAUSE IN ADDITION TO TAKING MONEY FROM A BANK BY "FORCE AND VIOLENCE, OR BY INTIMIDATION," THE OFFENSE CAN [A]LSO BE COMMITTED BY THE MEANS OF ENTERING A BANK "WITH INTENT TO COMMIT IN SUCH BANK - ANY FELONY AFFECTING SUCH BANK _ _ OR ANY LARCENY."

Whether petitioner's argument under United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019), deserves closer scrutiny