Pedro Gonzalez-Mendoza v. United States
DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY FINDING THAT MR. GONZALEZ-MENDOZA WAS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR A MITIGATING ROLE ADJUSTMENT PURSUANT TO U.S.S.G. §3B1.2?
DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY CONSIDERING EXTRANEOUS FACTORS IN DENYING AN ADJUSTMENT FOR MITIGATING ROLE?
DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY COMPARING MR. GONZALEZ-MENDOZA TO DEFENDANTS IN OTHER, UNRELATED CASES?
DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY DENYING MR. GONZALEZ-MENDOZA A MITIGATING ROLE ADJUSTMENT WITHOUT PROPERLY CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN THE 2015 AMENDMENT TO § 3B1.2?
DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY DENYING MR. GONZALEZ-MENDOZA A REDUCTION FOR HIS ROLE IN THE OFFENSE UNDER U.S.S.G. §3B1.2 WHEN THERE WAS SUFFICIENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO WARRANT THIS REDUCTION?
Did the district court err by denying Mr. Gonzalez-Mendoza a mitigating-role-adjustment