vaAV\ e.W\ £f +Vi<£ peVt-fvo \ne.c^ £-ovw{ '£,-V-tov r\ s
(fi '^r\v€. SY<3i\r£ fouVeA fo pfovi A-€ VuvYvAVte. ViM-i fYi^s
vY\eAi£-d\ 'CeCof As uik'« nW Afs^roveA VWe SVaAreLs
vNawe.n\ $ Ve A vc\ u <A. ef " of fecvs '-e du^atrisV V\ \ w\

(2,) AV\e pefW(o<\ef ALsd^vefeA a-fVer W\S -VWal -VV»e
s-faA-e u<seA per3'ii'CeA VesHmonv -fc> CorWtdA- V»\*w\ -»

Ca) -VVve. pe-fi+lorver LQ&s Ae^rWeA of a ppeUaf-e >fevi'eu3 of VsVS uocl'V c.etVi©\faA*i by arftaf^ex .slapeA W ,
a 5upV"ervig £g>t»<V CAetK Aeay^q Vu<S toffiK

£4} ~ft\e flefUWe^ WveA fioutf* \<X£\ceA Sulo'SeoA- waffer
Ci6 A1 C.*f v0<\ £j3AVt t-V V\\YY\ £5) TVv^. 'peVifiOAer A{aoV vc/vo(jointly oaA.\ A-VfcWfe^ew-Hy —

(fa) Tf e'pevMdnef u3as Ae*\leA Af\e xA^W-Vo a-fasVdrA
<5 p ee«Ay f-ctdA*

i UJaiVc his rMk+ i* £oo/)$*I anJ-? „| of f^e e/^tj en4& ^ Uis fnwf&et £.kctvge. ,* ^

Whether the petitioner's convictions were obtained in violation of due process