Anton Tuomi v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Issue 1: Whether the appellate court erred in concluding that petitioner was not denied his right to counsel when the state court accepted petitioner's motion to withdraw his guilty plea without first appointing him new conflict free counsel or providing him an opportunity to confer with conflict free counsel.
Issue 2: Whether the appellate court erred in concluding that petitioner's appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to argue that he had been denied his right to conflict free counsel before withdrawing his guilty plea
Issue 3: Whether the appellate court erred in concluding petitioner's appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise a claim that petitioner did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to conflict free counsel in violation of Faretta v. California.
Whether the petitioner was denied his right to counsel