No. 20-7181

Quincy O'Neill Taylor v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c) criminal-procedure drug-trafficking firearm firearm-possession government-burden-of-proof ineffective-assistance-of-counsel statutory-interpretation united-states-v-dye united-states-v-frady
Latest Conference: 2021-03-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

The Statute 18 U.S.C.924 (c)(1)(A) which states:
Except to the extent that'a -greater minimumsentence is otherwise
provided by this subsection or by any other provision of law,
amy person who during and in relationto any crime of violence
or drug trafficking crime(including a crime of violence or drug
an enhancement punishment
use of a deadly or dangerous weapon or
person may be prosecuted in a court oftrafficking crime that provides for
if committed by the
device) , for which the
of the- United States,
in furtherance of any such crime,
in addition to the punishment provided foruses or carries a firearm, or who,
possesses, firearm, shall,
such crime of violence
or drug trafficking crime-
DOES

The phrase "in furtherance of" requires the Government to
show "some nexus between the firearm and the drug selling
operation."(quoting United StatesvFrady , 245 F.3d 199,
(2d.Cir . 2001).203

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the phrase 'in furtherance of' in 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A) requires the government to show a 'nexus' between the firearm and the drug trafficking crime

Docket Entries

2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Quincy O'Neill Taylor
Quincy O'Neill Taylor — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent