No. 20-717
Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: article-iii article-iii-standing clean-water-act environmental-protection-agency environmental-standing epa-permitting hazardous-waste procedural-standing resource-conservation-and-recovery-act resource-conservation-recovery-act standing
Latest Conference:
2021-02-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does petitioner CCNS have Article III substantive standing to challenge the CWA permit?
2. Does petitioner CCNS have Article III procedural standing to challenge the CWA permit, where EPA's action violated CWA and blocked the entire RCRA permitting process?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does petitioner CCNS have Article III substantive standing to challenge the CWA permit?
Docket Entries
2021-03-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-02-09
Reply of petitioner Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-29
Amended corporate disclosure statement regarding brief in opposition of Triad National Security, LLC filed.
2021-01-27
Brief of respondent Triad National Security, LLC in opposition filed.
2020-12-22
Waiver of right of respondents United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al. to respond filed.
2020-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2021, for all resondents.
2020-12-08
Motion of respondent Triad National Security, LLC to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2020 to January 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety, Inc.
Triad National Security, LLC
James Taylor Banks — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Respondent
United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent