1. Whether the D.C. Court of Appeals is interpreting D.C. Code § 1-204 right when it is allowing the D.C. Superior Court to modify Federal Rules and is refusing to conduct its business according to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

2. Whether the accused have a right to attend the selection of the grand jury so he could utilize his right to challenge voire dire of grand jurors legal qualifications prior to grand jurors being administered the oath.

3. May it is that the accused is to be at every proceeding(s) against him, except the one proceeding the government needs to prosecute the case(s)?

4. Does an indictment challenge destroy a court's subject matter jurisdiction?

5. Whether the court can ignore an allegation raised in a motion to challenge the court's subject matter jurisdiction?

6. Whether every citizen of the United States of America have the right to equal treatment and to equal protection of laws?

Whether the D.C. Court of Appeals is interpreting D.C. Code § 11-947 correctly when it is allowing the D.C. Superior Court to modify Federal Rule and is refusing to conduct its business according to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure