I. Whether oa not the lower Covrts' "decision"to "timebar Petitioner' Claims of "Statutory tolling" was in "conflict" with Btatutory Congressional istert' under 28 D.5.C.5.$2254 (d)(1) ?

II. Whether oanot all lower Covats' decision"to operate State Covat Bule 32.1 (f), Ala.R.Cein.P., ("multiple judgmerts ahallerge Bule") is in with, Congress- "cont ional intest under 28 V3i6s. $2ast (B)'s "impediment doctRine, and "contrady to" oR "as vnceasonable opplication" of federal low annovnced in Burton v. Stewart, 549U.s.147 (2007 ) on an idestical set of facts ?

III. "orflict", with, other U.s. Appeal Ciavit's "decisions" 566 U.s.1,9(2012) ?

IV. Whether or not the lower Covat's "decision". 1974uo with other U.s. Appeal Ciwit& decision"in aplying this Covat's federal low annavneed in Dawis v. Drited States,417 U.5.333 (1974 ) ?

Whether the lower court's decision bars petitioner's claims of statutory rights under 28 U.S.C. § 2255