U Indies cw\ QjnoJaV'K AfAendmtnV clWiwi (b
Vq a ^enoo^ vv\€d\Ca\ need Ck<^o,\ a'SV
(X deO "vS'Nen^ ConVe*V-'\r\ vde\'i bf<~afe indiW-erencc.

Ov 0-b- PfO WVvov\ o(-bicCr— |)A*5CAV
oVo^oyx od v. j4bba$iT

3. If \V does ^)fe5eoVa neO Bwcos coa4«V ii <x qum\^{
^o^erv\ ,5ccX ^\ea5e SVcdubo V).V.C. cw\ c^d echoed-e cAWvoc^ve.
Ccw\<d\| \o Os. Veto 'S iAAOAbvj dowtac^eS AcooecXv^ ^
n*

Does an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against a U.S. Probation officer present a valid Bivens claim in violation of Ziglar v. Abbasi?