Jan Gawlik v. Scott Semple, et al.
DueProcess FirstAmendment FourthAmendment Securities
WHERE THE CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION VIOLATES THE FIRST AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS, DENYING USED RELIGIOUS/NON-RELIGIOUS BOOKS FROM PUBLISHERS WITHOUT INSPECTION, DENYING RELIGIOUS/NON-RELIGIOUS MAGAZINES, RELIGIOUS/NON-RELIGIOUS, CIRCULARS, PAMPHLAETS, LEAFLETS, NEWSPA-PER(.S) FROM. CHURCHS, MINISTRIES, ORGANIZATIONS, PRISON MINISTRIES, ECT, WITHOUT INSPECTION, DENYING PRAYER CARDS WITH MATCHING ENVELOPES, ECT, FROM CATHOLIC CHURCHS UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE POPE WITHOUT INSPECTION, DENYING FAMILY/FRIENDS CHILDRENS LETTERS, DRAWINGS, ECT, WRITTEN/COLORED IN MARKERS, CRAYONS, COLORED PENCILS, PENS, ECT, WITHOUT INSPECTION, DENYING LAMINATED PRAYER CARDS WITH PRAYERS, SCRIPTURES ECT, WITHOUT INSPECTION, DOES THIS VIOLATE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, ECT, AND DOES THIS VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS WITHOUT ANY INSPECTION THE FIRST AND FOURTEENTH AMEND-MENTS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OF AN INCARCERATED INDIVIDUAL.
THE INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS HAVE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS UNDER THE (R.L.U.I.P.A.-RELIGIOUS LAND USE AND INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT). WHETHER
Where the Connecticut Department of Correction violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments, denying used books from publishers without inspection, denying magazines, circulars, pamphlets, leaflets, newspaper(s), from churches, ministries, organizations, prison ministries, etc. without inspection, denying prayer cards with matching envelopes from Catholic churches under the authority of the Pope without inspection, denying family/friends children's letters, drawings, etc. written/colored in markers, crayons, colored pencils, pens, etc. without inspection, denying laminated prayer cards with prayers, scriptures, etc. without inspection, does this violate freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of association, etc. and does this violate the due process without any inspection the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution of an incarcerated individual, and whether the incarcerated individuals have religious rights under the Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act