No. 20-7092
Marlon L. Watford v. Randy Pfister, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Th
thot a poly on negulatin t nt be
inconsient with the low inder which it was
drafed d the Epth mendment wil when
pson ofile da a nialy oe
k
legal photi
consistent with the low under which it was
drafedin iolation of he federad lawl
the M
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioners' claims
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-02-18
Waiver of right of respondents Rob Jeffreys, et al. to respond filed.
2020-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2021)
Attorneys
Marlon L. Watford
Marlon L. Watford — Petitioner
Rob Jeffreys, et al.
Frank Henry Bieszczat — Office of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent