No. 20-7088
Mohamad Jamal Khweis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process fbi-procedure fifth-amendment fifth-amendment-violations interrogation interrogation-process miranda-rights missouri-v-seibert self-incrimination
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the intentional utilization by the F.B.I. of a two step interrogation process, without taking remedial measures as required by Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004), violate Petitioner's rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the intentional utilization by the F.B.I. of a two step interrogation process, without taking remedial measures as required by Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004), violate Petitioner's rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2021)
Attorneys
Mohamad Khweis
John Mann Beal — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent