No. 20-7087
Brian James Holland v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2241 conviction criminal-law criminal-procedure evidence evidence-sufficiency force-definition statutory-interpretation witness-credibility
Latest Conference:
2021-03-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
i) What is the definition of the term force Under Statute 18. USCS. 2241? What is the proper Criminal law and procedure used to determine sufficient evidence of force Under 18 USCS. 2241 when using that definition?
What is the proper Criminal law and procedure used by any United States Court of Appeals to make witness credibility determinations?
2) Is there sufficient evidence to uphold the conviction of Brian James Holland under Statute 18 USC 2241 (E), even tho the government failed to present a prima facie case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the definition of the term 'force' under 18 U.S.C. § 2241?
Docket Entries
2021-03-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Brian James Holland
Brian Holland — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent