No. 20-7083
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment burden-of-proof collateral-review criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process presumption-of-innocence rehau-v-united-states retroactive-application
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-06-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether A Criminal Defendant Substantial Rights To DUE ProcESS Under ThE Fifth Amendment OF ThE UnitEd States Constitution Denied In Light oF Rehaif v. Uhited Stat6s, 139 5.ct. 2191(2019)
WHETHER A CRIMINAL DEFENDANT PRESUMPTION OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE RESUMES IN LIGHT OF REHAIF U. UUITED STATES, 139 S.CT. 2191(2019)
WHETHER THIS COURT DECISION IN REHAIF U. UNITED STATES, 139 S.CT. 2I9I(LOI9) CREATED A NEW SUBSTANTIUE RULE THAT APPLIES RETROACTIVE TO CASES ON COLLATERAL REUIEW
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant has substantial due process rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution
Docket Entries
2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-21
Reply of petitioner Jeremy Brown filed. (Distributed)
2021-05-07
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-04-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 7, 2021.
2021-03-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 7, 2021 to May 7, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-08
Response Requested. (Due April 7, 2021)
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Jeremy Brown
Jeremy Brown — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent