Is d ueprocess Violat&J dut ~h> i'neffe:f iVe assistance
of Counsel when defendant aWofney did oof qivc
defendant opportunity to review Peesenfence l?ep0ft-
and <^wec<\/vtents sentencing /v\e^ofaAduM which Contained
CoA-tesW factual into Wati'o^ and led ty an overly
enhanced sen-fence?

Is due |KoceS5 Vio la-fed when a Sentence is enhance/,
based on ecconeous factual conclusions of which
defendant Cea 'c\/ed inadequate advance notice ?

Is due process violated when a defendant receives an enhanced sentence based on erroneous factual conclusions without adequate advance notice?