No. 20-7071
Pete Russell v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability future-dangerousness habeas ineffective-assistance-of-counsel merits-review strickland
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealabilty, through a merits review, of Russell's claim that he recei ved ineffect ive assistance of counsel at the punishment stage of trial with respect to future dangerousness?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability, through a merits review, of Russell's claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the punishment stage of trial with respect to future dangerousness?
Docket Entries
2021-08-02
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-06-11
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-12
Reply of petitioner Pete Russell filed.
2021-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-08
Brief of respondent Bobby Lumpkin in opposition filed.
2021-03-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2021 to April 9, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 9, 2021.
2021-02-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Bobby Lumpkin
Rachel Leigh Patton — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Pete Russell
Winston Earle Cochran Jr. — Petitioner