No. 20-7061
Frank Durand Tomlin v. Todd E. Ishee
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment basic-human-needs civil-rights constitutional-law discrimination due-process equal-protection prison-conditions public-policy standing
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
THE ISSUE OF PLAIN ISSUES UPON OF HYGIENE AND CASH ISSUES THAT DON'T WORK AT TRANSSHIPMENTS CONSTITUTE DEPRIVATION OF A PUBLIC GRIEVOUSLY EXPLICITLY HEARSED ON TWO GROUNDS FOR A CLAIM, & RELEVANT CONDITIONS VIOLATIVE OPTION CLAIM MENTIONED
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does prison officials' issuance of hygiene and cosmetics that do not work to prisoners constitute deprivation of a basic human need objectively sufficiently serious enough to be grounds for a claim of prison conditions violative of the Eighth Amendment?
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Frank Durand Tomlin
Frank Durand Tomlin — Petitioner