No. 20-703

William Kinney Jr., et al. v. Urban Housing Development, LLC

Lower Court: Oregon
Docketed: 2020-11-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process foreclosure jurisdiction mortgage-securitization property-rights res-judicata standing
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

1). Whether the Multnomah County Trial Court is without jurisdiction to Adjudicate the Defected Inferior FED action because of the Original jurisdiction of Petitioner's Verified Federal Complaint?

2). Whether or not Respondents Should be Allowed to Proceed with FED Action when Respondent UHD's Proper Remedy was an Action for Ejectment Under ORS 105.001?

3). Whether a Supersedeas Undertaking Requirement of the Value of "Use and Occupation" Should Be Equivalated to the Rate of the Purported Last Monthly Mortgage Invoice Statement?

4). Whether or Not it is Error for Respondent Multnomah County Trial Court to Rely Upon a Res Judicata Opinion of Dismissal of Counter claims based Upon Dismissal of Petitioner's Federal Complaint?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Multnomah County Trial Court is without jurisdiction to Adjudicate the Defected Inferior FED action because of the Original jurisdiction of Petitioner's Verified Federal Complaint?

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Urban Housing Development to respond filed.
2020-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Urban Housing Development
Mark G. PassannanteBroer + Passannante, P.S., Respondent
William Kinney, et al.
William Kinney Jr. — Petitioner