WHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT ORDER IN DISMISSING PETITIONER'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(5)(A) WITHOUT DETERMINING WHETHER THE ACTION OR APPEAL (i) IS FRIVOLOUS OR MALICIOUS; OR (ii) SEEKS MONETARY RELIEF AGAINST A DEFENDANT WHO IS IMMUNE FROM SUCH RELIEF.

MOREOVER, IF STATE JUDGES ARE IMMUNE FROM INFRINGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF DEFENDANTS IN CASES IN WHICH THEY PRESIDE OVER?

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals erred in affirming the District Court's order dismissing Petitioner's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 without determining the actions of Appellee were (i) frivolous, (ii) failed to state a claim on which relief was granted, or (iii) sought monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief