No. 20-7016

Andrew David Bruins, II v. Michele Whitman, Associate Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-provisions civil-procedure civil-rights court-proceeding due-process mandate relief remedies standing statutory-interpretation undue-burden
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

i dots ihc-' kntlc of Mandate, or Hi-t
Inslifuficn iotuetyds YiSiinci ftrWcil riofifcahon arid
Olpprova t before
remedies of a Pubhc mfresflI- The
rtsumpteon of atiscnporovM nc
The appropriate Cju-eskoft , doss
of ooCoMmodilTing
Only eskxbloh whtn court proceeding
nr, The au.
or LkCCQmmodiAfvt mformaher)
6'ir-e termed •
ippruprtuh cpeslim .dots provisions fhmf ref kef
techve logical advancement in The area of ancillary Old
ond SmviLQ. lit undue Specific reciuiremtnf for
determining fhi existence of urdui -financial and
adminishoiHvl burdtns 7a
ihr appropriate guesHon , does inrvicites and
.51 mrKbn-mmtef■jr
IV,lory arfunte 1

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the act or process of accommodating or accommodative information establish when court proceedings are deemed?

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Andrew David Bruins, II
Andrew David Bruins II — Petitioner