.IN APPENDIX H.PETITONER NOTICE OF APPEAL DID PETITIONE
SHOW "SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE AND FACTS" OF AL THREE WITNESS'S
WHO"SWEAREC UNDER OATH TO TELI THE TRUTH, BUT LIEd
ON THE STANd TO AN SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, ABSO JURY.

.IN APPENDIX H, CPETITIONER NOTICE OF APPEALPAGES,5DO THE FACTS SHOW THE PROSEUTOR KNOWINGLY
ANd
USING FALSE TESTINONY AND EVIDENCE TO OLTAIN A CONNIC
TiON.

DID PETITIONER"TRIAL ATTORNEY REPRESENT THE DEFENDANT
FAIRLY, WHEN HE DID NOT CHALLENGE ANY OF WITNESS
ROVIN LOPEZ"PERJURED TESTIMONY"IN VIOLATION OF DUE
PROCESS.

IN APPENDIX H, (PETITIONER NOTICE OFAPPEAL), FACTS
SECTION, PAGE 359, LINE 4-11. DO THEFACTS SHOW
THAT THE PRINCIPAL PROSECUTION WITNESS ROPIL
LOPEZ"RECANT TESTIMONY!

IN APPENDIXH, (PETITIONER NOTICE OFA
PEAL), FACTS SECTIO
P9.13,LINE I9-2Z, DiDOFFICER RODIN LOPEZ PROMISE TO bRIN
COOPERATION TO PROSECUTOR'S ATTENTION.AISO, AGREE TO

Whether the government's warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures