No. 20-6957
Alfred Paul Centofanti, III v. Dwight W. Neven, Warden, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: circuit-split collateral-order district-court habeas habeas-corpus interim-release interlocutory-appeal ninth-circuit standard-of-review
Latest Conference:
2021-04-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is a district court's order granting or denying an interim release motion in a habeas case an appealable collateral order?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a district court's order granting or denying an interim release motion in a habeas case an appealable collateral order?
Docket Entries
2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-02
Reply of petitioner Alfred Paul Centofanti, III filed.
2021-03-22
Brief of respondents Dwight W. Neven, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-02-18
Response Requested. (Due March 22, 2021)
2021-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent Dwight W. Neven, et al. to respond filed.
2021-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Alfred Paul Centofanti, III
Jeremy Baron — Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
Dwight W. Neven, et al.
Heather Diane Procter — Respondent