Under the amendment of the U.S. Constitution, if there is a search seizure by prosecutor never mentioning it to the defendant and it was never mentioned by trial or appellate counsel, and pro se prisoner has never seen it, is this still a "Brady and progeny" violation?

Due to lack of constitutional claims; pro se prisoner brings substantial evidence in support of those claims, does that evidence become constitutional merits and worthy to be reviewed?

After resentencing by a Remittitur shall a pro se prisoner be entitled to a new direct appeal and due to ineffective assistance of counsel?

Should not any merit claiming Fraud on the Court be taken seriously void implicating the Court itself?

If prosecution should not be held to have "access to any information that an agency not involved in their investigation or that agency, should not prosecution now be held to have access and prosecutorial liability?

The Dist. Ct. claims to have made a de novo determination.

If prose prisoner was denied rights under the I, IV and XIV amendments of the U.S. Constitution does he or she have to still claim actual innocence to be heard or is miscarriage of justice enough?

If the Court issues an Order for Temporary Removal to return to same prison after Remittitur hearing, but prisoner is does the date of finality begin on the date of new amended abstract of judgment and resentencing or when prisoner is returned?

May prisoner receive the time difference as equitable to filing?

May a judge waive a prisoner right without consent?

Whether the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides an opportunity for a full and fair litigation of an unconstitutional state law that is never mentioned by trial or appellate courts