No. 20-6939
Thomas Nevius v. Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law brady-violation civil-procedure civil-rights co-defendant-confession confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidence-admissibility judicial-discretion standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR WHEN IT DECIDED THAT CO-DEFENDANT (WILLIAM BOSTON) MINIMIZED HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE HOMICIDE, THEREFORE MAKING HIS CONFESSION TO POLICE UNRELIABLE AND INADMISSIBLE AT PETITIONER'S TRIAL?
2. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR WHEN IT SUBSTITUTED ITS OWN JUDGMENT FOR THAT OF THE EVIDENCE, TO DENY PETITIONER'S BRADY CLAIM?
3. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR WHEN IT SUBSTITUTED ITS OWN RECORD FOR THAT OF THE TRIAL RECORD, TO DENY PETITIONER'S CONFRONTATION VIOLATION?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent Grewal, Att'y Gen. of NJ, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Grewal, Att'y Gen. of NJ, et al.
Thomas Nevius
Thomas Nevius — Petitioner