No. 20-6927
Anthony Freeney v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553a audio-recordings criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency jail-phone-calls jury-instructions jury-verdict sentencing standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
GUILTY VERDICT?
DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR IN ADMITTING AUDIO RECORDINGS OF MR. FREENEY'S JAIL PHONE CALLS?
DID THE SENTENCE IMPOSED BY THE DISTRICT COURT UNREASONABLE BECAUSE IT IS GREATER THAN NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE GOALS OF 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the evidence insufficient to sustain the jury's guilty verdict?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-02-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Anthony Freeney
Amy R Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent