1. ARE SECTION 2254, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, AND ACTUAL INNOCENCE GATEWAY CLAIM THAT GOVERN THE COMMON LAW WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS COMMON LAW A LEGAL STANDARD OF PROCEEDING AND A TIME BAR PROCEDURE BAIL COMMANDS THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TO REFRAIN FROM PROCEEDING ON THE MERITS OF A TIME BAR?

2. DO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT HAVE THE APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTITUTION SEPARATED "SEPARATED" "SUPPRESS" WITH BREVITY" A PETITIONER'S FEDERAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PRIOR TO THE EXHAUSTION OF THE APPELLATE?

B. WHEN PETITIONER OBLIGATED BY LAW TO CONTINUE THE LITIGATION ON THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AFTER PETITIONER INFORMED THE DISTRICT COURT OF FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

C. ARE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OBLIGATED BY LAW TO STAY THE PROCEEDING AND REMAND A CASE PENDENTE LITE TO COURT IONS "HALT THE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT IN THE DISTRICT COURT BE FOR PETITIONER IN LIGHT THE NINTH CIRCUIT PRIOR TO THE DISMISSAL OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS?

5. SHOULD PETITIONER HAVE BEEN ALLOWED AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AT REQUEST OF THE DISTRICT COURT ON HIS HABEAS PETITION MOCKINGLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ATTEMPTING TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE ALLEGATIONS INVOLVED ARGUING IN DISTRICT COURT IN THE FOURTH CIRCUIT AMENDMENT VIOLATION OF REMOVE PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES SUPPORT OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS?

10. IN ACCORD FEDERAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ARE §§ UUFDCE, C.S.2INE, AND U.S.C. TEERIDAD 113 FOR FEDERAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS PROVIDING FOR CRIMES COMMITTED WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO AS PUNISHED IN ACCORDING TO THE SUBDIVISION OF TODAY LAW IN?

7. WHETHER PETITIONER ENTITLED TO BE CLEARED WITH LAW SB! PETTY MITE MENTED, OF ENSE FOR SLAM AND AITI GIMPMEUA JI THE FALSE THREE TO FIVE TIMES AND TO BLOWS SPLIT / AT BRUISE THE CORPORATION?

8. WHETHER THERE A BRADY VIOLATION, SUPPRESSION VIOLATION CAUSE BY THE UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF THE PIERLET TER CONSTITUTIONAL EVIDENCE?

A. WERE THERE ANY DELIBERATE JAVIDIGUS DETRACT WISE IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF LAW COMMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR WAIVE RHAVIKAL DISTRICT WE BAT IMUSAAITA BY THE MALQ LAWFUL SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM DUO GIL PITRATT AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS?

Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's federal petition for writ of habeas corpus based on a time bar procedure that commands the United States district court to refrain from proceeding on the merits of a time bar