Macho Joe Williams v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.
DiD The Trial court Abuse Its Disctetion when He Denied Apellant's Motions
To Sever
a. Dig The Trial couwst commit Reversible Ervor when He faile To Hold A
Hearing Regaurding Defendant So Attorneys conflict ofIntrest and when
He Failed To Discharge Sot's Attorney Due To Her Previous Representation of
Appellant?
3. Did The Trial court Eror in faiting to EnterA Jhdgement of
uquittal an /orCorantin Applant's Motien for a New Trial since
Insutficient Euldence Was Presente?
whether the cowst in running the senrtences for some of the counts
onsecutive to the vilate the prohibitions of A..- and thus
mposed illegal sentences?
Whether trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to.
bject to ant raise the issue if sentencing ersor concerning the
Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Appellant's motion to review a 2019 order