No. 20-6892
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment compelled-testimony constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment jury-instructions self-incrimination sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
4he U^e^lc'i^erAfeasor 4o Calf
D^Pe^SC. a [/lo/aJ't'ojO o\ b&fh A" Q/^A /VA^ejuAbeAs Pcl coi-f-yjsSS Cr -jP23) |a)\\hoiA XoooL/Ap -Me u)eplAby -fhe. trier oV Po.A /
is -}he AA tj/SS/O/3 oPCL [/oiAcA JA^i-l/O CoaJ i/icP/o/3 <2-/0
U/OCrD/^pp-A/'o^r^ / c&yJi'a,/ op Cbe 'process u^cCer -Me. lA 1
Anne/^AoesA ?
3) Dl'A Ph*2- SAA e (Pour4 (y/bA^s -Hoe. piiPoAJ^rs rjCfApo °~
■Qzfr 4ria-l Uc>Aer 7Me /A 7^ Aeje/o oA?cA Qr PPfr licy ~h ezlbro
y]eossSary 'Jury )jds~bruAioyS by A?e A/^/ OccuA ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the State violated the Petitioner's rights under the 5th and 6th Amendments by compelling the testimony of a witness who invoked the 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination?
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2020-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Vashaun Williams
Vashaun Williams — Petitioner