1. IS DISMISSAL AVAILABLE TO REMEDY A BRADY VIOLATION AND ALSO DID CHONG ESTABLISH A BRADY VIOLATION THAT WARRANTS DISMISSAL?

2. DOES A YOUNGBLOOD VIOILATION REQUIRE DISMISSAL WHEN BAD-FAITH IS CONCEDED BY THE STATE?

3. DOES THE VIOLATIONS IN THIS CASE REACH THE CRITERIA OF THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AND STOP CHONG FROM HAVING A FUNDAMENTALLY FAIR TRIAL?

4. DOES THE POLICE' ST ACTIONS BY DESTROYING AND THEN REPLACING OTHER EVIDENCE TO SECURE A CONVICTION CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF A DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS?

5. DOES THE ABSENCE OF TRANSCRIPTS ENTITLE CHONG TO A NEW TRIAL WHEN THE MISSING TRANSCRIPTS ARE NEEDED TO IDENTIFY ERRORS?

6. DOES THE MISSING TRANSCRIPTS VIOLATE THE COURT REPORTER ACT?

7. DOES THE MISSING TRANSCRIPTS STOP CHONG FROM HAVING A MEANINGFUL APPEAL WHEN APPELLATE ATTORNEY IS DIFFERENT FROM TRIAL ATTORNEY?

Is dismissal available to remedy a Brady violation and did Chong establish a Brady violation that warrants dismissal?