Is it right that the defendant Wexford health service,(Menard C C )
have returned to their same old song and dance and have been not properly
or timely refilling plaintiffs Parkinsons medications ?The plaint if has not.been recieving his full perscribed doses of Mirapex for months now
he is supposed to take 3.75 mg a day thats a 1 mg tab and a .25 mg tab
3 x a day he has only recieved the 1 mg tabs for the months of July Aug
and spept its now Oct still no .25 put in orig sticker put in requests, told nurses ,tiled emergency grievance warden concured energency 1
from clincal servicers a summary 39/30 20, emergency griev dated
y 25 20 supposed to respond within 48 hrs ? regardless its now oct 12 20
no reply no meds / What am I supposed to do give up ? jjust accepjb that
n't one cares > no ones going to do anything about it ?(Griev # 319 9 20)1)

2)Is it just a matter of a convicted person in the State of Illinois
can be treated anyway,that a person is not supposed to be treated
ordng to the 8th amend, of the U S Constitution ?acc3) Isn t a convicted person entitled to consideration medically and humanly under the 8th amend. ?to decent treatment,

4) If it would please the court and if the plaintiff had known he
obligated to show or includeother peoples problems in his own personal
complaint, making it basically a class action he would have done so
is this the case on an individuals personal claim under the 8th Amend.?was o

d) I&n,t it a privacy issue ,even a legal or confidantil issue of another
inmates medical history or file from population or other r'lndom inmates
how is one inmate supposed to get information on another inmates medical
Inscriptions delivery or any other form of his medical situation . So he can use it in a personal law suit ? And what does ,
John Convict Doe s medical history or medicine history have to do with Scott Hildreths ?

6)
p*w15
Court of Appeals , where in a rare eh bonch, three more judge -joined in dissent ? (Rovner,Scudder,and Wood ) J

7-) Should plaintiff Scott Fjildreths complaint have been dismissed on
Summary Judgementwhdn Magistrate judge Wilkerson denied and set for trial
2n dls MeCS°'J 1jdatL°? ^hen i? fact he all the work on the Case hearingsavmg Mr Hildreth before him personally via video confrense court, and
qcctually made a sound decision on facts related directly to him by all
parties including incarcerated plaintiff ,defendant Wexford ect.and then
Judge Rosentstengle over rode that decision on her say so of ?
hen the U S Court of Appeal for the 7th Circuit went against their own prior decisions on point the made their ruling based upon?

Is it right that the defendant Wexford health service, (Menard CC ) have returned to their same old song and dance and have been not properly or timely refilling plaintiffs Parkinsons medications?