No. 20-686
Response Waived
Tags: brady-violation civil-rights constitutional-law discovery-violation double-jeopardy due-process equal-protection mistrial oregon-v-kennedy prosecutorial-misconduct standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess
FifthAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Are significant discovery and Brady violations by the
prosecuting attorney, necessitating the grant of a mistrial,
sufficient to invoke the double jeopardy protections against
"goading" as set forth in Oregon v. Kennedy ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant statutory and constitutional provisions
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent Arkansas to respond filed.
2020-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 17, 2020)
Attorneys
Arkansas
Michael Shock
Jeffrey Marx Rosenzweig — Petitioner