No. 20-686

Michael Shock v. Arkansas

Lower Court: Arkansas
Docketed: 2020-11-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: brady-violation civil-rights constitutional-law discovery-violation double-jeopardy due-process equal-protection mistrial oregon-v-kennedy prosecutorial-misconduct standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

Are significant discovery and Brady violations by the
prosecuting attorney, necessitating the grant of a mistrial,
sufficient to invoke the double jeopardy protections against
"goading" as set forth in Oregon v. Kennedy ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant statutory and constitutional provisions

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent Arkansas to respond filed.
2020-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Arkansas
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Michael Shock
Jeffrey Marx Rosenzweig — Petitioner