Whether the Fifth Circuit properly applied plain error review in rejecting Petitioner's argument that he should have received a minor or mitigating role downward adjustment under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, in light of this Court's holding in Davis v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (2020), that there is no legal basis for declining to review unpreserved factual arguments for plain error.

Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in holding that a defendant's claim for a minor or mitigating role downward adjustment under the Sentencing Guidelines is not reviewable on plain error review