I) Does the Supreme Court of the United States have authority to represent a client in a post conviction petition when the Supreme Court's representative is the client did direct representation at the time of the post conviction assistance and counsel at the post conviction?

II) Does the lower court have authority to dismiss a post conviction petition when the statement dismisses the post conviction petition?

III) Does the trial court properly deny the client's right to seek redress of deprivation of effective assistance of counsel at a critical stage?

IV) Has the Alabama Supreme Court misapplied actions of the lower court in this case so that the court deprives the client of the right to appeal?

Question not identified