Whether Cedryck Davis's convictions for the attempt murder of Naja and Shawn Harringon should be reversed because the prosecution failed to sustain its burden of proving him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt where the evidence identifying him as one of the offenders was unreliable and inconsistent.

Whether Cedryck Davis's conviction for the attempt murder of Naja Harrington should be reduced to aggravated discharge of a firearm because the State failed to show that he had the specific intent to kill Naja beyond a reasonable doubt, and because the doctrine of transferred intent should not apply to this case, as Naja was both an unintended victim, and remained uninjured.

Whether Cedryck Davis was denied a fair trial where the prosecution was permitted to introduce other crimes evidence, ostensibly for the purpose of establishing identity, but which also unnecessarily informed the jury that Davis was investigated by officers for a shooting two days before the shooting in this case, based on a purported statement from a witness who denied his statement entirely when he testified at trial.

Whether Cedryck Davis's convictions for the attempt murder of Naja Harrington and Shawn Harrington should be reversed