Whether petitioner was denied his Constitutional Right to a Speedy Trial Pursuant to the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gonzales v. State, 435 S.W.3d 601, 815 C Tex. App. 2014)

Whether the delay of approximately 24 months between time of arrest to time of indictment on Aggravated Robbery Charges was Presumptively Prejudicial. Maples v. [legal citation] F.3d 1020 C644 Cir. 2005.)

Whether petitioner asserted his Speedy Trial right could not abandon his request therefore. Redd v. Souder, 604 F.2d 1266, 1269 (6th Cir. 1981) Com v. Smith, 686 F.2d 374, 394 (6th Cir. 1982).

Whether pretrial incarceration 24 months in length was oppressive and constituted prejudice, and length of delay impaired the defense's ability to prepare possible defense. Witnesses were no longer available or memory of facts substantially faded.

Whether the Sixth Amendment made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees a speedy public trial the accused. See Sixth Amendment of Constitution, in Amendment of Constitution and Art. Section 10 Texas Constitution and Art. 1.05 (Vernon Supp. 2003). Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 222-23, 67 S. Ct. 816 L.Ed.2d 1076 D.

Whether petitioner was denied his Constitutional right to a Speedy Public Trial pursuant to the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments