No. 20-6815

Robert Munoz v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-due-process double-jeopardy due-process false-testimony fourteenth-amendment indictment jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference: 2021-02-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

IS IT WRITTEN IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION THAT A PERSON MAY BE INDICTED, REINDICTED .3-TIMES WITH SAME CAUSE NUMBER: BROADEN, ABANDON, AND BRING ABANDONED CHARGES BACK?

DOES AN INDICTMENT TOLL THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON A REINDICTMENT THE STATE KNOWINGLY .FABRICATED THE CHARGES ON SAID REINDICTMENT?

DID THE COURT ERR BY PERMITTING THE STATE TO MENTION IN OPEN COURT, A RECORDED BAIL PHONE CALL NOT INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE THE STATE MISREPRESENTED THE RECORDINGS CONTENTS?

DID THE COURT ERR WHEN IT PERMITTED THE STATE AND DEFENSE WITNESS TO PRIVATELY LISTEN TO A RECORDED BAIL PHONE CALL WHITLE NOT ALLOWING THE BURY THE OPPORTIJNITY''TO LISTEN TO SAID RECORDING?

DID THE COURT ERR BY DENYING AN EYE-WITNESS TO TESTIFY ABOUT WHAT SHE PERSONALLY EYE-WITNESSED; CRAWFORD?

IS IT A VIOLATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION FOR THE STATE TO OBTAIN A CONVICTION ON THE USE OF KNOWN FALSE / PEROURED TRIAL TESTIMONY?

DID THE COURT ERR WHEN IT FAILED TO ALLOW DEFENSE COUNSEL TO IMPEACH COMPLAINANT ON'-'KNOWN TRIAL TESTIMONY-PEROURED?

DID THE COURT ERR IN ALLOWING THE STATE TO FILE A MOTION TO CUMULATE SENTENCE AFTER GUILT / INNOCENCE OUST BEFORE SENTENCING NOT KNOWN BY THE OURY (TRIER OF FACT)?

DID THE APPELLATE COURT TS ADOPTING TIME BARRED COUNTS NOT ALLOWING PETITIONER HIS GUARANTEED RIGHTS OF MEANINGFUL APPEAL ON CLAIMS OF VOID JUDGMENT AND ACTUAL INNOCENCE?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it written in the U.S. Constitution that a person may be indicted, reindicted 3-times with same cause number: broaden, abandon, and bring abandoned charges back?

Docket Entries

2021-03-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent Lumpkin, Dir., TX DCJ to respond filed.
2020-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Lumpkin, Dir., TX DCJ
Jessica Michelle ManojlovichOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Robert Munoz
Robert Munoz — Petitioner