No. 20-6783
Jaelon David Harris v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abduction administration-of-justice circuit-split federal-criminal-procedure federal-sentencing-guidelines location-definition room-or-area sentencing-guidelines victim-movement
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the forced movement of victims from one room or area to another room or area within the same building constitutes an abduction for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2B3.l(b) (4) (A) of the federal sentencing guidelines. (Notably, other circuits have addressed the question, and there is a split of authority).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the forced movement of victims from one room or area to another room or area within the same building constitutes an abduction for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(4)(A)
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Jaelon Harris
Yolanda Evette Jarmon — Law Office of Yolanda Jarmon, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent